![]() The high court considered this case extraordinarily quickly. ![]() ![]() A QUICK TURNAROUND FOR A TIME-SENSITIVE CASE It’s also an embarrassment for Republican legislators who moved last year to limit the panel’s discretion.īy deciding this case on narrow grounds, the Iowa Supreme Court left some big legal questions to be adjudicated another election year. The result was a big loss for Republican plaintiffs who challenged the State Objection Panel’s decision to let three disputed signatures on Finkenauer’s petitions stand. Two justices concurred with the outcome of reversing the lower court but did not explain their reasoning. They reversed a Polk County District Court, which days earlier reached the opposite conclusion: that an undated signature cannot be counted, and therefore Finkenauer did not qualify for the ballot. Senate candidate Abby Finkenauer to the Democratic primary ballot.įive justices resolved an apparent contradiction between two parts of Iowa’s election law by saying an incorrect or missing date is not a valid reason for not counting a signature on a candidate’s petition. The Iowa Supreme Court surprised many in the political and legal worlds on April 15 with a unanimous judgment reinstating U.S.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |